No. 20-8338
Mark Woods v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals district-court due-process final-judgment jurisdiction mandamus writ-of-procedencia
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
i. V\Jhe4her tee united S-tetes Cour-f of Appels -for tee, Third c4rouH-
obused i-fs d'i-screpon In denning Pe4igoner 's Vvlrrt of pr&eecVencio ed
3bdi£iotn or AAandoxnus or
^ Vtee4ter pte-Honec Is eoteled 4o The, relief Sou^hf os 4-he, louder appellate
CourV onl^ have Jurisdiction of Appels from all fined decisions of
-^e dlsktef- coods, of tee united JStetes* %%OteercuiSe*
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Abused Its discretion in denying petitioner's Writ of Procedendo ad Judicium or Mandamus or Otherwise
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Mark Woods
Mark Woods — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent