No. 20-8331
Charlene Walker Rosa v. Michael J. Satz, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: attorney-client-confidentiality civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state attorney's opening statement at the prosecution's closing argument violated the accused's right to due process and a fair trial
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2021-12-01
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2021-10-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Charlene Walker Rosa
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner