Gersu Guisao v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
1. Did individual counsel collateral counsel breach no. Judiciary job) loading three, of four grooms 4wvt mydodkA'-Wne critical Expert $ndL material udi+wesses , ©nee. a^aim dua'ilable., to tesbt^?
2. LObeAher utain^ A. sob stanza \ ^poorxd in initial rexiieui oohabml proceed*^ is-baataiwoont •fo not h&o\<\<j reused- the, ground 'tor the, purposes cd a Madtoee federal rexJiecP?
3 ODbetherVeAO 1' esuvAe^t-e, *ft>r-thepurpose ob the- Actual-wiooeenefi, o?beu)a^ oh Parkins 'tneluetes reUaVAe eAAdev\<L£.4bat available bob not presented Sit tidal , \b\tia\ r&JiexJ eolldteeal <9 neb ^&A©na\ proceedings , ©nth, instead, most be, neudy <b^c£we.f€d , pre\Aoos\\( omohliable emdevice 2
Did the initial review collateral counsel breach his fiduciary duty by waiving three of four claims that included critical expert and material witnesses