No. 20-8296
Carrington Sturgis v. Maryland
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-precedent standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the memos of the remire were boad against apelent cut or Austaticr
Dathe court abue Hs discretion in 4ailing to addess apellants reguest to discharg counsel
C When the court gronted counsel's motion to withdrawappecrnce, was Apellant deried hisright to be pesent and his rght to counsed
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2021-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 14, 2021)
Attorneys
Carrington Sturgis
Carrington Sturgis — Petitioner
Maryland
Daniel John Jawor — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent