1. When a District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to the United States Supreme Court Decision in RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, 116 S.Ct 1246 , 134 L.ed. 2d 419, 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Is a Correction of the Defendants Judgment and Commitment Order required.

2. Does the District Court 1s failure to correct a Defendant's Judgment and Commitment Order represent a deprivation of life and liberty as defined by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution4

3. Does the District Court 's refusal to correct the Judgment and Commitment order essentially create a double jeopardy? Multiple teirs of government agencies have used and will use this information to deprive Martinez of his Life and Liberty based on a count that was vacated through due process.

When a District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, is a correction of the defendant's judgment and commitment order required?