No. 20-8267
Christopher Jermaine Kelley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process essential-element guilty-plea judicial-review parties plea-bargaining
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err in denying the petitioner, Christopher Keldrick, pursuant to U.S.C. § 2255, United States, Saia Algi United States v. Minchew Merced Up 18 Zimbo (First O. December 2020) on pending Supreme Court Cert Avuited states v. Whitehead Kirexi dom case (asO. Pea-O-?a
Does a Heppan C? on essential Medicant o'p On offense Voxels, C/ Judojlrnryat?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Christopher Kelley
Christopher Jermaine Kelley — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent