No. 20-8264
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process harmless-error judicial-procedure procedural-error sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, through "assumed error harmlessness review," appellate courts may affirm a criminal sentence without addressing allegations of significant procedural error on appeal.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, through 'assumed error harmlessness review,' appellate courts may affirm a criminal sentence without addressing allegations of significant procedural error on appeal
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeremy Hough
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America, et al.
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent