No. 20-8246
Tony Ray King v. Stanley Payne, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability defaulted-claim ground-for-relief habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-trevino-exception procedural-default strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a petitioner need to meet the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) standard when presenting a defaulted claim under the Martinez-Trevino exception or does he simply need to show that the ground for relief is factually supported and is not "without merit?"
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner must meet the Strickland v. Washington standard when presenting a defaulted claim under the Martinez-Trevino exception or only needs to show the ground for relief is factually supported and not 'without merit'
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-17
Waiver of right of respondent Stanley Payne to respond filed.
2021-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Stanley Payne
D. John Sauer — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Tony King
Kevin Louis Schriener — Law & Schriener, LLC, Petitioner