1) Was error Committed by the Appellate Division when it neglected to consider
Appellant 's Pro- Se Supplemental Brief, or to file said brief considering the
Circumstances .(Covid - 19, Ineffective Appellate Counsel)

2). Should Remand be ordered in relation to failed plea bargain negotiations R. 3:9-3 , R. 3:91

3). Was defense counsels failure to present any strategic or tactical defense theory below the
standard of proficient representation .

4). Did the States use of perjured testimony, and edited Surveillance footage, deprive
defendant of a fair Trial when that surveillance footage disappeared for two and one half
years before state introduced or acknowledged its existence

5). Should information supplied by the Police be both factual and legally sufficient , as
opposed to the misleading and absent of pertinent facts.

6). Should text messages that are only partial bits and pieces of a conversation and
overwhelmingly prejudicial and affirmatively misleading be allowed into evidence if they
also violate the doctrine of completeness.

7). Has the trial court abused and overstepped its authority when it allowed Illegally obtained
evidence via Police Misconduct and violation of Constitutional right, previously
suppressed by the Appellate Division into evidence, now calling it "Inevitable
Discovery "

8). Should the Grand Jury Indictment stand when defendant 's Constitutional right not to be a
witness against himself in a Criminal prosecution has been violated

9). Once an individual states "I DO NOT WANT TO GET INVOLVED " has all consent
therefore been immediately, effectively withdrawn regarding a warrantless consent
search.

10). Has the trial court deprived defendant of presenting "HIS DEFENSE " when it refused to
allow sworn affidavits of events to Jurors at trial unless stipulation of testimony is agreed
to by defendant.

11). Should conviction stand with the state 's use of perjured testimony and tampered
evidence.

12). With the state not meeting its burden of proving the requirement of Premeditation, for
knowingly and purposeful murder pursuant to 2C:2-2[3b] beyond a reasonable doubt,
how has the Appellate Division allowed that conviction to remain when it is clear the
Jurors failed in performing their duties.

13). Why are their two standards / levels of "proof ' for beyond a reasonable doubt, when it
comes to a Black man facing a Murder charge in the State of New Jersey especially
where the case is mainly circumstantial.

14). Although text messages show some dissatisfaction of the situation between Abdul- Aziz
and Jackson , it clearly does not establish any pre- disposition for the commission of a
crime. Yet, the Jurors were not instructed as to how the text messages were to be used.
And wrongly allowed to assume premeditation . Therefore, should the text messages have
been allowed at trial without specific direction by the court, being they only served to
prejudice the defendant unfairly.

15). Has the Appellate court erred in waiving or deferring its review authority by merely
conceding with the trial Judge Personal conclusions contrary of law regarding sentence,
Past criminal history, Aggravating, Mitigating , and the totality of the circumstances

Question not identified