1. At Petitioner's trial why did my lawyer not Conduct a pre-Trial investigation, my (Petitioner), CM EbMObtb HH/ty's Case!

2. Why d'd Petitioner's Lawyer not CcdL any important 'facts witmtsseSj Medicalexperts^ b)JJt PXperfSjfrXuol assault experts to guest ion the. scientific medicu! definition of the (Complain - fonts SeXUaL us fault exonti nafron os m) favd U. Hfllin S W f id 210 Of bndstadt V, (Lean Zlt I 2d 111. /21

3. Jf ike definition given in Pppemns's B/,efftX Yd! 1 of BO^Qt/pgUj States that after a Z hour exam Cn at ton fevea/ed no trauma ~to Com plain tants Vigincij Hymen f Cervix,or Per ineum^and this H the medical cJefin iti on of u woman ufbo Is a virgin ^then ufby is Petitioner frill In prison -for the none erisharer Crime erf Inserting his penis Into Com plain to nTS vigma once or twice a uieefl

1. Petitioner ast phis Ho nor a Me Court Hits very Important gve^rian.^ ujoujdntfbis medit Hit Comp/aintant not a V try In Oh the time of the. Z hour examination!

Uh y u/ostht physician nett Called to testify Instead of using Secondhand testimony from Peer! CppeHeurt's fir Up (p, t \Jo! 1 atti)py 3.

hjiou/ Is It fhot the examining physician and the fexua/BsSouJf Purse art &t disagreement OS to whether a sex tW astout t toojt place 1 C,CtfitX\foh(rt 98)pgHjphysic Ian s frtondho-nd testimony . Cluing fexvaf assoUltf PA(dX,Voh> at lat)pg/C,fexval ffssault Expert do/Ws no Sexual a SCOUIff

%0oesn't this Crease a Variance and hour Coj/dPetitioner he Convictedu/itbout Evidence?

8. Jf Dalton v. State 898 hU 2J929(jex.fpp-brtldortf Iftf), icfrn/e as to oJhuf happens tv a tuoman uJho Is a \rrrgtp u/bin Sexually assaulted f then hour Is b that CoMplalntanfs uJha is a Vitginj(fate~ mentf true l fLppe)Van ft l$rCe'fl(pt(l\td i at Itljpgb, and (LypeJ/anfs Brief, :,(tEVol '3 ert lUbtZaypglfl

% pre not these Statements an Impossibility uritk a Virgin l

If). If Petitioner has not Sey.ua I(y assaulted Com/uLcunfadf) inserting hb penis Once or twice a. U/teiC far tears j

Whether Petitioner's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct a pre-trial investigation and call important fact witnesses, medical experts, and sexual assault experts