No. 20-8236

Brady Lee Ray v. Kentucky

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2021-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process first-degree-robbery fourteenth-amendment kentucky-supreme-court sentencing-errors supreme-court-rule uscs-supreme-court-rule-10 wanton-endangerment
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did Kentucky Supreme Court Violate Section C of USC S of Supreme Ct. R. 10
and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when
Denying Direct Appeal issue on Direct Verdict of Robbery First Degree.

2. Did Kentucky Supreme Court violate Section C of USCS of Supreme Ct. R. 10
and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when
Denying Direct Appeal issue on Direct Verdict on Wanton Endangerment.

3a Did Kentucky Supreme Court violate Section C of USCS of Supreme Ct. R
and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitutional when
Denying Direct Appeal issue on palpable Error at Sentence Phase.

3b Did Kentucky Supreme Court violate Section C of USCS of Supreme Ct. R. 10
and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitutional when
Denying Direct Appeal issue on palpable Error at Sentence Phase.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Kentucky Supreme Court Violate Section C of USCS of Supreme Court Rule 10 and therefore the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2021)

Attorneys

Brady Ray
Brady L. Ray — Petitioner