WILL THE "SANCTION" PENDING HINDER PETITIONER FROM "EXERCISING" PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PRISON OFFICIALS INCLUDED HAVE PLACED PETITIONER AGAINST IN "JEOPARDY WITH A "DISEASE" PETITIONER NEVER HAD DURING "COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC."

IF THIS "SANCTION STANDS" WHAT EFFECT WILL IT HAVE ON THE "PUBLIC" I.E. THE "COURT'S" SANCTIONS THEM AND THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED AND THEY'RE "INNOCENT" HOW WILL THEY GET REDRESS?

THE FOURTH CIRCUIT FOUND AN "EX POST FACTO" VIOLATION IN A "LAW" REQUIRING A "DISQUALIFIED FEE" FOR "DNA TESTING" BEFORE A "PRISONER" CAN BE "PAROLED" EUBANKS V. S.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORR. (IN RE EXPOST FACTO ISSUES) 562 F.3d 294; 362-74 (4TH CIR. 2009). THE "FIFTH CIRCUIT'S" DECISION "CONFLICTS" WITH THIS "RULING BY THE FOURTH CIRCUIT" THE "STATUTE" VIOLATES "PENAL" DAMAGE AND THIS "SANCTION" IS "PENAL" DAMAGE CANNOT STAND.

Whether the petitioner's fundamental constitutional rights were improperly infringed upon by COVID-19 prison policies