Clark D. Young v. United States
(1) WAS the defendant deprived of his sixth, Fifth, and Fourteenth amendments , when Counsel fAiled to investigate his. Criminal history?
(2) was the defendant cleprived of bis Sixth and Feurteent, amendments when Counse)\ faileel to Speake U9 when the Clefendant Was giving a inonsisknt and Wcovwweck Serttence >
(3)Is + Considered & Confitct of Interest when a prosecutuy fy the UsS- Was a district Athorney against the defendant, in Te of the enhancements vsed against hin trom his pris 2
(4) Wlos it a Breach of Conhacdt on behalf of the government ty disregarcl and Lqnore the de¥endants InetEckve Mssishince of Comsel Claims 2
(5)Qon a National Seale, what determines suffictent perk ethic for a ans yer" TO b@ Considered effective and Ade gubte , 25 the Constitution requires?
Whether the defendant was deprived of his Sixth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights when counsel failed to investigate his criminal history