No. 20-820

Denise Jackson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection federal-programs federal-rules hearing-notice judicial-fairness
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is evidence the rule of law a part of our constitution?

Does the court have the right to choose who benefits from the constitutional protections?

Is the court supposed to rule in my favor because my evidence substantiates my complaint?

Is this a violation of due process rights for the civil proceedings?

Is this a violation of the FRCP? I'm supposed to have 14 days notice before scheduling a hearing that I have proper time to prepare?

Was the Judge suppose to confirm the hearing date with me before scheduling the hearing to ensure I was available?

Is this fair and impartial treatment or discriminatory treatment?

Are the Judge and the opposing side allowed to communicate without my presence?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint without providing proper notice and opportunity to be heard

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-19
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-18
Reply of petitioner Denise Jackson filed.(received Feb. 24, 2021)
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-19
Brief of respondent Wells Fargo Home Mortgage in opposition filed.
2020-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Denise Jackson
Denise Jackson — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Christopher Neil GrayDuane Morris LLP, Respondent