No. 20-8198

In Re Khayree Smith

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-06-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process equal-protection ex-post-facto habeas-corpus property-rights racial-classification reconstruction-amendments slavery
Latest Conference: 2021-06-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

(negro, black,colored) to any person of African descent after 1865? This act reinstates such persons as chattel propertv and reopens the institution of slaverv under colorable constitutional amendments.

R)
Are blacks 'slaves' or otherwise 'persons', as used in the 14th amendment, and how can thev be made 1st class citizens without their inalienable Free National descendant name of their forefathers?

C)
As for Blacks with criminal records, what crimes can'property' possibly commit which its owner, the slave master, is not accountable for in a court of law?

D) If one can produce a (Black)'slave', the same one must also produce'the (black) slave owner."

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What branch of law authorized states to apply abolished slave labels (negro, black, colored) to any person of African descent after 1865?

Docket Entries

2021-06-28
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-05-24
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Khayree Smith
Khayree Smith — Petitioner