1) Whether the Decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court for the District of New Jersey were contrary to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Garza v. Idaho , 586 U.S. S.Ct. 738 (2019); Roe v. Flore-Ortega , 584 U.S. 470 (2000) and McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. , 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018), 139

2) Whether Petitioner was subjected to Ineffective Assistance of Third Circuit Appointed Counsel when Counsel failed to Raise and argue the Garza Issue on Appeal to the Third Circuit when Petitioner's Appeal was pending at the time when Garza was decided? (see District Court Opinion at Appx C at *6); (see also Appendix D-l to D-7, Severs v. Attorney Gen, of New Jersey , No. 18-1822, 793 F.App'x 72 (3d Cir. Nov. 5, 2019))

Whether the Decisions of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court for the District of New Jersey were contrary to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Garza v. Idaho, Roe v. Flore-Ortega, and McCoy v. Louisiana