No. 20-8190

Rickey Leon Scott v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-06-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does Senate Bill 43, M37 likely conflicts with Article II of the Constitution?

2. May requiring Courts to overrule their odd. A MAIC preceded simply because ad gon later Adopt A different interpretation in shade A vilehod of "Due Process"? ye * Miscarriage of whee"?

3. Is judicial power to be exercised Be the purpose ne Aividing efees to be oil of the Legislature! ar id other words te the will tthe aves?

4. Did the California State Supreme Court ald the Sie Sa California's Cauel AG Anpedh. ¢icst Appellant Medio Divs) isk lleA its three Adal athea| 'tech wJiq ues te Aid "Hs VEL oe « | dcferentticn eviews SC UN Al axanidded ®the welt of the offelsa Aud the oftelder, With patti¢lar Attalhod t> the Acoree ct "ae | lal > i my Haba Corfu, Dertal.; Saving this vile arses Gade Adie 7 cones, * less in P ¥ Mlow's Aud qe' Ste es Sulashtate Yer poling pretirenices Br the oriaid Méatica of a stalabe 2 at Oa 4

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Senele Bill aa, M37 likely codthits ith AAide TL of the Constitution

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Rickkey Leon Scott
Rickey Leon Scott — Petitioner