Rickey Leon Scott v. California
HabeasCorpus
1. Does Senate Bill 43, M37 likely conflicts with Article II of the Constitution?
2. May requiring Courts to overrule their odd. A MAIC preceded simply because ad gon later Adopt A different interpretation in shade A vilehod of "Due Process"? ye * Miscarriage of whee"?
3. Is judicial power to be exercised Be the purpose ne Aividing efees to be oil of the Legislature! ar id other words te the will tthe aves?
4. Did the California State Supreme Court ald the Sie Sa California's Cauel AG Anpedh. ¢icst Appellant Medio Divs) isk lleA its three Adal athea| 'tech wJiq ues te Aid "Hs VEL oe « | dcferentticn eviews SC UN Al axanidded ®the welt of the offelsa Aud the oftelder, With patti¢lar Attalhod t> the Acoree ct "ae | lal > i my Haba Corfu, Dertal.; Saving this vile arses Gade Adie 7 cones, * less in P ¥ Mlow's Aud qe' Ste es Sulashtate Yer poling pretirenices Br the oriaid Méatica of a stalabe 2 at Oa 4
Does Senele Bill aa, M37 likely codthits ith AAide TL of the Constitution