No. 20-8177
Michael T. Brooks v. Agate Resources, Inc.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure due-process federal-rules informa-pauperis judicial-procedure pro-se-plaintiff rehabilitation-act retaliation standing
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can the federal courts ignore the Federal Rules?
2. Are the federal courts subject to the Rehabilitation Act and the American 's With Disabilities Act and the ADAAA extensions?
3. Are attorney 's allowed to misrpresent fact (lie) to the court and Pro Se Plaintiffs'? Can the Article 3 Courts ignore this?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the federal courts ignore the Federal Rules?
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-01
Motion (20M82) of respondent for leave to file the petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2021-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent Agate Resources, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-04
Reply (20M82) of respondent in support of motion for leave to file the petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2021-04-27
Response (20M82) of petitioner to motion of respondent for leave to file the petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2021-04-19
Motion (20M82) of respondent for leave to file the petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Agate Resources, Inc.
Rachel Catherine Lee — Stoel Rives LLP, Respondent
Michael T. Brooks
Michael T. Brooks — Petitioner