1. Whether a Court may grant summary judgment without jurisdiction; and
where there is no absolute or quasi-judicial immunity; where there were no
discovery proceedings in any court; where there is an allegation of judicial
officials and county employees aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty
(fraud); and where the Action involves fundamental substantive
constitutional rights (i.e. Petition Clause; Due Process Clause).

2. Whether a citizen of the United States may be denied a real estate property
interest without a Hearing (i.e. Petition Clause! Due Process Clause! Equal
Protection of the Laws).

3. Whether a Court may deny an in forma pauperis Petition without a hearing
(i.e. Petition Clause; Due Process Clause).

4. Whether a 'not precedent ' decision should involve fundamental substantive
constitutional rights (i.e. Petition Clause! Due Process Clause).

5. Whether a Magistrate Judge or District Court may decide, under 28 U.S.C. §
1915, for a non-prisoner, 2 or prisoner, in forma pauperis litigant, whom an
Action or Petition should not be brought against; or decide who should not be
interested or adverse parties in an Action or Petition, contrary to rule of law
as to joinder of parties (e.g. Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 19 Required Joinder; or Rule
20, Permissive Joinder).

6. Whether a Magistrate Judge or District Court may delay and/or refuse
Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4(c)(3) U.S. Marshal service of process upon interested
parties or adverse party defendants listed in the certificate of service for a
Petition and or named on forms 285 filed with the Clerk.

7. Whether it is unlawful or improper for the Courts or government to delay or
refuse to perpetuate evidence of financial resources that may be available to
an in forma pauperis litigant.

Whether a Court may grant summary judgment without jurisdiction