Question I
Whether the Government sought to diminish the likelihood of
Petitioner's finding of a Brady violation, by interjected a
manufactured declaration to mislead the machinery of the
court?

Question II
Does the Court of Appeals denial of a Certificate of Appeal
ability sanctioned the lower court's predisposition towards
the benefit of the Government, call for an exercise of this
court's supervisory power?

Question III
Did the lower courts applied the proper legal standards for
Petitioner's Equitable Tolling before such denial, which
conflicted with the decision of other Circuits?

Whether the Government sought to diminish the likelihood of Petitioner's finding of a Brady violation, by interjected a manufactured declaration to mislead the machinery of the court?