No. 20-8144
Tamara Rouhi v. Kettler, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-courts fourth-circuit injustice judicial-procedure motion-to-dismiss standing
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. There has been no redress of my grievance.
2. The Defendants did not make a single valid point, but still prevailed in the case. That is unjust.
3. My rights were violated by Federal District Court of Maryland and the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
4. I'd like the previously mentioned injustices to be corrected.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
There has been no redress of my grievance
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent Habitat America, LLC to respond filed.
2021-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent Kettler Management Inc. to respond filed.
2021-05-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Habitat America, LLC
Louis C. Long — Thomas, Thomas & Hafer LLP, Respondent
Kettler Management Inc.
Charles L. Simmons — Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Respondent
Tamara Rouhi
Tamara Roughi — Petitioner