DueProcess
I. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION
BY DEPRIVING AND DENYING THE DEFENDANT OF HIS STATUTORY RIGHTS TO
DNA TESTING TO A CHARGE OF FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT WHEN THE
STATE COURTS USES DEFENDANT'S NO CONTEST PLEA AGAINST DEFENDANT TO
DENIED THE DEFENDANT DNA TESTING PER FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION.
II. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS ERRED AND ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION TO
DENY [A] DEFENDANT TO DNA TESTING ON EXISTING DNA EVIDENCE THATS
BEEN CONCEALED AND HINDERED FROM DEFENSE SINCE 2008. PER THE FEDERAL
AND STATE CONSTITUTION.
III. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS CAUSED INFRINGEMENT TOWARD THE DEFENDANT
RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS CLAUSE UNDER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS
OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSITUTION TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
OF AMERICA TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 3 OF THE NEBRASKA CONSTITUTION.
PER FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION.
Whether the state courts erred and abused their discretion by depriving and denying the defendant of his statutory rights to DNA testing