1. Whether this Court has jurisdiction to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directed to the court of appeals, on the basis that it has abused its discretion in declining to review de novo, a judgment from the district court's denial of, your pro se Petitioner's, Rule 60(b)(1) motion to set aside its judgment.

2. Whether a misreading of a motion, that result in the use of untrue facts in the Rule 60(b)(1) motion hearing, to make a determination to set aside a judgment, constitute an inadequate and unmeaning ful hearing - if yes:
(a) Is an inadequate and unmeaning ful hearing the same as no hearing at all, if yes
(b) If CPLR proceeding conducted in the above noted manner, is that proceeding conducted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law?

3. Whether court of appeals abused its discretion by declining to review, pro se Petitioner's, due process of law claim, arising after opening appeal brief was filed, and arose during district court's ex parte hearing of a Rule 60(b)(1) motion to set aside judgment.

4. Whether the district court abused its discretion by declining to review de novo, pro se Petitioner's amended pleadings, during district court's ex parte hearing of a Rule 60(b)(1) motion to set aside judgment alleging district court misreading of the amended factual allegations caused untrue facts to be used to conclude pro se Petitioner failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

5. Whether the question of the validity of a judgment is a legal one requiring de novo review.

6. Whether the court of appeals is required to conduct a de novo standard of review to determine if the district court misread pro se Petitioner's amended complaint, and used untrue facts in its determination of the voidness of its judgment, when a Rule 60(b)(1) motion to set aside judgment was properly before the district court.

7. Whether this court should exercise its discretion to issue a Writ of Mandamus to the court of appeals.

Whether this Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the Court of appeals