1. Whether a child abuse investigator can give a medical
diagnosis/opinion to the court without a Doctors opinion to remove a
child.

2. Whether unauthorized practice of Medicine violates both Procedural
and Substantive Due Process

3. Whether the District and Appellate courts can determine if /when
drugs have been used without seeking the opinion of a Medical Review
Officer/Expert when removing a child.

4. Whether simply notifying a parent of a child abuse allegation satisfy
the 14th Amendment Procedural Due Process requirements when
removing a child.

5. Whether a child abuse investigator relying on an uncorroborated
allegation and testifying that it is "known knowledge of facts "
violates the 14th Amendment Substantive Due Process Clause.

6. Whether a child abuse investigator can give a false testimony in effort
to remove a child if probable cause exists for any other reason.

7. Whether a child abuse investigator withholding exculpatory evidence
constitute perjury by omission and violate the 14th Amendment
Substantive and Procedural Due Process Clause.

8. Whether a court could accept a disputed affidavit used to remove a
child in a prior proceeding as true and correct without requiring
evidence.

Whether a child abuse investigator can give a medical diagnosis/opinion to the court without a Doctors opinion to remove a child