No. 20-8119
Peter Anthony Ciraulo v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure harmless-error jury-trial nonunanimous-verdict sixth-amendment structural-error unanimous-verdict
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a trial court commits structural error for purposes of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, when the trial court instructs a jury in a criminal case that the jury can return a nonunanimous guilty verdict.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court commits structural error for purposes of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, when the trial court instructs a jury in a criminal case that the jury can return a nonunanimous guilty verdict
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2021-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Peter Ciraulo