No. 20-8102
Adam Rosen v. Bernadette Mason, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violations criminal-procedure due-process federal-habeas ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief precedent self-incrimination state-court-review
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Commonwealth's use of a defendant's statements to the Commonwealth, which were not elicited in violation of the defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, was an unconstitutional and unreasonable application of the Court's precedent in Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976) and Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Adam Rosen
Adam Rosen — Petitioner