I) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE ANOTHER TRIAL BASED UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS?

2) DOES THE PETITIONER CLAIM HIS TOTAL INNOCENCE BASED UPON DNA EVIDENCE FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES?

3) DID PETITIONER REQUEST LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO FEDERAL CRIMES BEING COMMITTED?

4) WAS BLOOD SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE CRIME SCENE FOR DNA IDENTIFICATION OR OTHER INVESTIGATORY METHODS?

5) DOES THE PETITIONER/DEFENDANT HAVE SUCH RIGHT TO SUCH DNA SAMPLES FOR EXONERATION PURPOSES IN CLAIMS OF HIS INNOCENCE?

6) ARE THERE FORGED AND FALSIFIED RECORDS AND/OR INFORMATION BEFORE THE COURTS TO FALSIFY A CONVICTION WRONGFULLY?

7) DOES THE PETITIONER THINK IN THE FOREFRONT THAT SECTION 3521 OF TITLE 18 U.S.C.§ IS BEING USED TO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST THE PETITIONER?

8) WAS THERE A VIOLATION OF THE MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AG AND THE PERSON BEING PROTECTED?

9) SHOULD THERE BE AN EXHUMATION OF THE ALLEGED DEAD CORPSE OF. PETITIONER'S WIFE,WHOM HE CLAIMS IS STILL ALIVE AND WELL?

10) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRESENT PROOF BY DEFENSE WITNESSES AND LEGAL DOCUMENTATION?

11) DID THE TRIAL COURT COMMENCE SUCH PLAIN ERROR IN SUCH CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS NOT ALLOWING THE PETITIONER NOT GETTING A "FAIR AND IMPARTIAL" TRIAL UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS?

12) WAS THERE A "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE "INVOLVED "

13) WAS THERE SUCH "CAUSE AND PREJUDICE"TOTALLY INVOLVED?

14) DID PETITIONER SEE HIS ALLEGED DEAD WIFE UPFRONT AT SCI-HOUTZDALE /AND FACE TO FACE ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS?

15) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE SUCH GRANTING OF A GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION INTO SUCH CRIMES AGAINST HIM V?

16) IS THE PETITIONER FALSELY IMPRISONED UNDER FALSIFIED RECORDS AND INFORMATION - AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS?

17) ARE STATE AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE, AT HAND?

18) DOES THE PETITIONER DESERVE A REMEDY FROM THIS HONORABLE COURT FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

19) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY?

20) DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOSE HIS OWN COUNSEL OR AN ATTORNEY OF CHOICE?

21) DID SUCH ATTORNEY OR COUNSEL APPOINTED BY- THE COURT ABANDONED THE PETITIONER?

22) IS THERE MUCH REASONABLE DOUBT IN PETITIONERS CASE?

23) WAS THERE ALOT REASONABLE DOUBT FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF PETITIONERS CASE,AT HAND?

24) WAS EVIDENCE EXEMPTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE?

25) WAS ANY EVIDENCE COLLECTED FROM THE CRIME SCENE?

Does the petitioner deserve another trial based upon constitutional rights violations?