No. 20-8081
Melvin Roshard Alfred v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure evidence evidence-admissibility federal-rules-of-evidence intrinsic-evidence misconduct-evidence rule-404(b) rule-404b social-media uncharged-misconduct
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether uncharged misconduct evidence that does not directly prove the charged crime may be deemed "intrinsic evidence" and admitted without the admissibility requirements and procedural protections of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether uncharged misconduct evidence that does not directly prove the charged crime may be deemed 'intrinsic evidence' and admitted without the admissibility requirements and procedural protections of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Melvin Alfred
Grant Russell Smith — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent