No. 20-8079
Kevin L. Martin v. Kenneth P. Cotter, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's claim of equal protection under the law
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Cotter, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Kenneth Cotter, et al.
Aaron Thomas Craft — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Martin
Kevin L. Martin — Petitioner