No. 20-8064

Derrick Grant v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assault assault-statute criminal-law federal-agency federal-officer-employee federal-state-balance prison-employee statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Section 111 of Title 18 of the United States Code prohibits assaulting any person "designated in section 1114 of this title." Section § 1114 designates "any officer or employee of the United States or of any agency of the United States Government . . . or any person assisting such an officer or employee in the performance of such duties" as qualifying. Here, the defendant punched an employee of a company that operates a private prison and was convicted of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 111. The courts below identified no officer or employee being assisted. Instead, the courts found that that the private employee was assisting the Marshals Service, a federal agency. But an "agency" is not "an officer or employee." Was the private prison's employee "assisting such an officer or employee" such that the employee was a covered person under § 1114?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a private prison employee assisting federal marshals is covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Derrick Grant
Anna GreveTaft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent