1.) Is a OATH OF OFFICE a valid Contract under the Laws
and Rules of this United States and the Constitution???

2.) Does the taking of a OATH OF OFFICE , provide the taker
a valid property interest under the Due Process Substanive
Clause of the Constitution of the United States ?

3.) Did the Lower Courts ABUSE OF DISCRETION by not considering
Pro Se Plaintiff's [FACTS] that, he was allowed to begin '
work and continue to work with out signing any other documents
other then the OATH OF OFFICE ?

4.) Did the Appellate Court error in concluding, that Pro se
Plaintiff Kampfer had no property interest, fundamental,
or otherwise in the DCO position ?

Is an oath of office a valid contract under the laws and constitution?