No. 20-803
Morgan Joseph Langan v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: article-iv constitutional-interpretation due-process federalism judicial-sovereignty legislative-act property-rights republican-government separation-of-powers takings vested-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the State of Arizona possess the transcen
dental sovereignty to take away petitioner 's vested
rights in private property by a mere legislative act that
usurps the power of the judicial branch and alters the
nature of our republican and free government as guar
anteed under Article IV § 4 of the Constitution for the
United States of America?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the State of Arizona possess the transcendental sovereignty to take away petitioner's vested rights in private property by a mere legislative act that usurps the power of the judicial branch and alters the nature of our republican and free government as guaranteed under Article IV § 4 of the Constitution for the United States of America?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arizona to respond filed.
2020-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)
Attorneys
Morgan Langan
Morgan Joseph Langan — Petitioner
State of Arizona
Drew Curtis Ensign — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent