Did the Executive Office for United States Attorneys violate petitioners' constitutional rights involved under First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments in error under Clearly Established Law Test the defense use regarding Qualified Immunity under FCC 230 passed by Congress providing for Corporation to have Indemnification from Petitioners third party thought and speech by the use of Corporate search engines, video post, text, email, and fax during Order 589 of the Supreme Court of the United States during COVID 19 under Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Homeland Security Act of 2002 or US Patriot Act, Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 ?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures