No. 20-8009
David Calhoun v. Pennsylvania, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-claim discovery due-process habeas-corpus habeas-petition judicial-review public-record public-records state-supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court was correct in denying petitioner's motion to compel production of documents and whether the court of appeals denied petitioner due process
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2021)
Attorneys
David Calhoun
David Calhoun — Petitioner
Pennsylvania, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent