No. 20-8002
Jason Andrew Cavazos v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-sentencing plain-error relevant-conduct sex-offense u.s.s.g.-§2g1.3(b)(4)
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the court of appeals failed to properly apply the plain error analysis to the question of whether the sentencing court erred by including a two-level enhancement for the offense involving a sex act pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2G1.3(b)(4) when the conduct giving rise to the enhancement was not relevant conduct to the offense of conviction?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals failed to properly apply the plain error analysis to the question of whether the sentencing court erred by including a two-level enhancement for the offense involving a sex act pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2G1.3(b)(4) when the conduct giving rise to the enhancement was not relevant conduct to the offense of conviction?
Docket Entries
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Jason Cavazos
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent