No. 20-7997

John Sloan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts administrative-review civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection judicial-procedure legal-standing medical-care retaliation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was Pefifioners rights vio lated when:

a She was not afforded a safe work envivonment while incarcerated?

bo he was a nectie of retaliation seeking redvess for a workplace injury

F he was dni fol at specialists Vis request and specialiss recommendations?

Orthopaedi specialist was hindered from sharing with patient authorization?

ihdDep ieolicy?

2 Did the Count err in not adopting Stafe issues when L Pefifioner's first communicated that he was denied due access to the Courts whent process and equal ahe was denied default judgment in his favor upon defendants nexaused faildire to appear?

b Oral Arguments were held in the Petitiomers ab sence, and judgment was mede inffororgfof defendants in the absence of the Petitionen?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's civil rights were violated when he was denied work opportunities, retaliated against for seeking medical care, and denied due process and equal access to the courts

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 11, 2021)

Attorneys

John Sloan
John Sloan — Petitioner