No. 20-7992
Noah Drake Primeaux v. Louisiana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment jury-instructions non-unanimous-jury prosecutorial-misconduct ramos-v-louisiana sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the holding in Ramos v. Louisiana would apply to persons on Direct Appeal concerning the non-unanlmous jury Instructions.
2. Reasonable jurists would detamine that Mr. Primeaux was denied his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to a fair and impartial trial, and that the district court erred in denying the Motion for Mistrial due to the prosecutor's improper remarks.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurists would determine that the holding in Ramos v. Louisiana applies to persons on direct appeal concerning the non-unanimous jury instructions
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Noah Drake Primeaux
Noah Drake Primeaux — Petitioner