No. 20-7986

Kevin Dunbar v. Arizona

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2021-05-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attempted-first-degree-murder consecutive-sentences constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidence-weighing kidnapping self-representation supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was the petitioner's aggravated sentences was in violation of due process and conflicts with the United states Supreme Court holdings in Apprendi V. New Jersey and Blakely v. Washington when the Court not the jury found aggravating circumstances by ponderance of evidence

Was the petitioner's due process and double seopardy were volated whenthe court imposed consccutive. sentences for kidnapping and attempted first degree murder

Did the courts commit veversible error by denying petitioner's Farella rights to self- representation when it ruled that the pelitioner cannot represent himself no longer in Chumbers without giving the petitioner notice

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's aggravated sentences were in violation of due process and conflict with the United States Supreme Court holdings in Apprendi v. New Jersey and Blakely v. Washington

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevin Dunbar
Kevin Dunbar — Petitioner