1. Why was I denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case? The only thing that had any bearing on this case was the Affidavit of Merit: So, why wasn't the doctrine of Common knowledge considered?

2. Why is the Affidavit of Merit, an unholy, prejudice law, for a special interest group, considered a law? Is this racism?

3. Did not the affidavit of merit give Dr. Peck Jr. the license to assault me?

4. Why is the law, i.e. the Affidavit of Merit, put before the facts in my case? Is not the purpose of the law to judge the facts?

5. Why wasn't I told the implant could not be removed, even before the fourth operation? Obviously, that is a he. So, if the implant could not be removed, why did Dr. Peck Jr. operate?

6. According to: The Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal, I have been assaulted four times: Isn't the Doctrine of Informed Consent and Refusal also a law? So why was assault not a cause of action, in The N.J. Superior Court?

7. Was not George Peck Jr. covering his tracks, for the statute of limitations when he did the subsequent operations? i.e. the three subsequent assaults?

8. What, am I a practice cadaver?

Why was I denied my right to a trial by jury, or even a hearing on the case?