No. 20-7976
Treyton Lee Thomas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-provision court-filing due-process excessive-fines incorporation jurisdictional-issue legal-document scotus-petition writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER RE GOVERNMENT PREACTE) E PLEA AGREEMEST BY ADVOCATING FON AN OSTRUCTON OF TUSTCE SENTENCIAL GOWDEUNES ENHAMCEMENT.
WNHETHER RE CONERNMEN'S ASSERTION THAT M. THOMAS WM WELIGIE FOR A CUPELINES REDUCTION MECANSE T 6RANTEN 3 POINTS FON ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBMITY 15 VACI
WILHERTEF M. THOMAS' SENTENCE WHICH WAS ENANCEA AFTEN HE SIGNEL HIS MEA AREEMENT, 1S IROCEJURALLY AN 3Eng UN REASONAXE.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Treyton L. Thomas
Treyton L. Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent