Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power when it sanctioned the Southern District of Florida's finding that Glenn's claims, well pled from personal knowledge, that his counsel had rendered ineffective assistance by defrauding him, misleading him, and, tendering a false document to the Court could be dismissed without either response, or, an evidentiary hearing?

Did the Eleventh Circuit so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power