No. 20-7937
Isaac Lee Loggins, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
How DETERMINE IF A PERSON OR THEIR 2 CIRCUMSTANCES ARE EXTRAORDINART AND COMPELLING
I.
DID THE LOWER COURTS AND HIS ASSIGNED COUNSEL LOGGINS PREJUDICE BY NOT FOLLOWING PROCEDURES AND, INSTEAD MAKING WELL-ESTABLISHED 2 DECISIONS FOR THEIR OWN CONVENIENCE 7
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts abused their discretion by not following well-established procedures and instead making decisions for their own convenience, which prejudiced the petitioner's ability to present their extraordinary circumstances
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Isaac Loggins
Isaac Lee Loggins Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent