No. 20-7931
Oscar Segura-Resendez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-due-process due-process ex-post-facto fifth-circuit guidelines harmless-error post-conviction-relief sentencing sentencing-retroactivity
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is vidlation of the ex past Lacte clause of the 0.5, _
| Constitukion harm ess if the sogefic definition of 2x
| DoS CackO Was done by the Coote
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether violation of the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution is harmless if the specific definition of the conduct was done by the court
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Oscar Segura-Resendez
Oscar Segura-Resendez — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent