No. 20-7887

Ronnie Spells v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: crack-cocaine discretion first-step-act judicial-discretion mandatory-minimums racial-disparities sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation systemic-racism
Latest Conference: 2021-05-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether District Court Judge Castel and the Second Circuit Appeals Court perpetuated continued systemic racism by contending that Congress left out the factors that a court should consider in exercising its discretion to reduce a black defendant's sentence under Section 404 of the First Step Act when Congress purpose of the statue obviously did not intend to set forth any additional or so-called factors the Second Circuit believed was left out and therefore, the district court was correct to assemble its own factors that minimized the unwarranted disparity in mandatory minimum triggering quantities for crack cocaine offenders?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether District Court Judge Castel and the Second Circuit Appeals Court perpetuated continued systemic racism by contending that Congress left out the factors that a court should consider in exercising its discretion to reduce a black defendant's sentence under Section 404 of the First Step Act

Docket Entries

2021-06-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Ronnie Spells
Ronnie Spells — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent