No. 20-7879
Vincent Gino Chavez v. Brian Cates, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: capital-case capital-cases circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process jury-instructions lesser-included-offense lesser-included-offenses noncapital-cases
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
In Beck v. Alabama, 477 U.S. 625, 638 (1980), this Court held that a criminal defendant is entitled to jury instructions on lesser included offenses in capital cases, but deferred ruling on whether the Due Process Clause requires giving such instructions in noncapital cases. Id. at 638 n.14. This Court has not yet answered the question, and the circuits are split on their answer. Accordingly, the question presented is: Does the Due Process Clause require giving lesser included instructions if warranted by the evidence in a noncapital criminal case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Due Process Clause require giving lesser included instructions if warranted by the evidence in a noncapital criminal case?
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent Ken Clark, Warden to respond filed.
2021-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Ken Clark, Warden
David Andrew Eldridge — Respondent
Vincent Chavez
Vicki Marolt Buchanan — Vicki Marolt Buchanan, PC, Petitioner