WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST.CHARLES COUNTY MISSO- I.
URI, THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICK, AND
THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT, DENIED PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS, EQUAL
PROTECTION OF THE LAW, AND ACCESS TO THE COURTS, AS THOSE COURTS
REFUSED TO CORRECTLY APPLY MATERIALITY OF BRADY V. MARYLAND 373
U.S. 83 (1963), WHILE REFUSING/DENYING PETITIONERS BRADY V. MARY
LAND CLAIM. WHEN THE RECORD UNDISPUTEDLY SHOWED THAT THE STATE
SUPPRESSED MATERIAL INFORMATION, COMPRIZED OF A 1983 LAWSUIT
WHICH WAS WON BY THE PLAINTIFF AGAINST OFFICER HUNT AND ST.CHARL
ES COUNTY, ALONG WITH A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO OFFICER HUNT
WHICH LEAD TO A CONVICTION, AND THAT MANY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,
POLICE DEPARTMENTS KNEW OF BOTH THE LAWSUIT AND CRIMINAL INVESTI
GATION INTO OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HUNT.

WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST.CHARLES COUNTY MISS- II.
OURI , THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICK, AND
THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT, DENIED PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS, EQUAL
PROTECTION OF THE LAW, AND ACCESS TO THE COURTS, AS THOSE COURTS,
INCORRECTLY APPLIED THE "KNOWN PERJURED TESTIMONY" AND FALSE EVI
DENCE/TESTIMONY OF NAPUE V. ILLINOIS 360 U.S. 264 (1959), WHILE
REFUSING TO CONSIDER SOME/ALL THE MATERIAL FACTS OF VIDEO'S AND
TIMELIMITS IN ORDER TO CORRECTLY APPLY NAPUE. WHEN THE RECORD IS
CLEAR THAT THE TIMES ON THE VIDEO'S, THE VIDEO'S AND THE TIME OF
THE ACTUAL PHONE CALL BY THE VICTIM, PROVES THE KNOWN PERJURED
TESTIMONY OF STATE WITNESS, AMBER KEYS.

WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST.CHARLES COUNTY MIS- III.
SOURI , THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICK,
AND THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT, DENIED PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS,
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW, AND ACCESS TO THE COURTS, AS THOSE
COURTS REFUSED TO APPLY OR CORRECTLY APPLY "FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS"
TO PETITIONERS CLAIMS, EVEN AFTER ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR OWN EXCEPT
ION TO RAISE DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS IN A 29.15 PCR, WHICH WAS FOR
FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS RIGHTS. WHEN THE RECORD SHOWS PETITIONER WAS
DENIED BEING ABLE TO PUT ON A COMPLETE DEFENSE AS THE STATE REFU
SED DISCOVERY OF VIDEOS AND TIMED TRAVEL ROUTES AND MORE.

WHETHER THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST.CHARLES COUNTY MISS
OURI, MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE EASTERN DISTRICK, AND THE
MISSOURI SUPREME COURT, DENIED PETITIONER, DUE PROCESS,

Whether the state courts denied due process, equal protection, and access to courts by misapplying Brady v. Maryland, Napue v. Illinois, and Strickland v. Washington