No. 20-7836
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr. v. Ted Wire, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law age-discrimination appointment-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment employment-law federal-employment federal-question standing
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
BOHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF Appeals ERk IN THE ORDER OF TISTRIUT o ADOPTING OF JUDGE SCHROEDER, IN DISMIS TE D. THOMAS Right(s) Aer OF 1964, TiTlE THE 1 Civil AGE CON EMployNeNT Act, PErini DER'S FOURTEENTH ANENTNENT Clain, aND T00 DENIAL OF HS Ue COUNSE;
OF THE FEDERAL QUESTION IS WHETHER PETITIONER ONSTITUTIONAL Right(s) Has BEON iNFRINGED
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in affirming the order of the district court to dismiss the Title VII civil rights and Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims of petitioner
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr.
Derrick Michael Allen Sr. — Petitioner