No. 20-7823
Alan Trowbridge v. Jeffrey Woods, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review counsel-deficiency criminal-procedure federal-law habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-precedent prejudice sixth-amendment sixth-circuit strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decide an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with this Court's holding in Strickland v. Washington?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decide an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with this Court's holding in Strickland v. Washington?
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-08
Waiver of right of respondent Jeffrey Woods, Warden to respond filed.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Alan Trowbridge
Jeffrey Woods, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent