1) Should this Court resolve a circuit split concerning the question as to whether Courts should allow gross trebling damages or net trebling damages under the FCA?

2) Should this Court resolve and settle an important FCA question concerning as to whether Courts should apply the "benefit of the bargain" analysis or the "tainted claim theory" on intangible benefits that are difficult to calculate?

3) Should this Court reverse the decisions of the lower courts when they erroneously excluded the damages evidence when the Respondents suffered no prejudice or surprise when they admitted that they had knowledge of the damages evidence?

Whether courts should allow gross trebling or net trebling of damages under the False Claims Act