No. 20-7801
Cody Lee Herman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: and sentencing stages plea constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining plea-stage plea-stages pro-se-objections right-to-counsel sentence sentencing sentencing-stage
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Whether Petitioner's Right to the Effective Assistance of Counsel Was Violated During the Pretrial and Plea Stages of this Case Requiring That Petitioner's Conviction and Sentence Be Vacated.
B. Whether Petitioner's Right to the Effective Assistance of Counsel During Sentencing Was Violated When Counsel Failed to Provide Argument Supporting the Request for a 15-year Sentence.
C. Whether the Appellate Court Improperly Failed to Construe Petitioner's Pro Se Objections Liberally in Violation of this Court's Dictate in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Right to the Effective Assistance of Counsel Was Violated During the Pretrial and Plea Stages
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2021)
Attorneys
Cody Lee Herman
Matthew McGavock Robinson — Robinson & Brandt, PSC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent